NEW SILK STRATEGIES
  • Home
    • Русский язык
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Español
  • Geopolitics
    • International Relations
    • Military Affairs
    • News & Analysis
    • Culture
    • Economics and Finance
  • Language
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Contact

International relations.

SURPRISING DETAILS ABOUT XI JINPING'S LIFE AND THOUGHT THAT YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW

5/14/2020

5 Comments

 
Vince Dhimos answered a question at Quora.
 
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-African-countries-better-off-under-the-influence-of-the-USA-the-UK-and-France-than-under-China/answer/Vince-Dhimos

Why are African countries better off under the influence of the USA, the UK and France than under China?
 
Vince Dhimos, Editor-in-Chief at New Silk Strategies (2016-present)
 
They’re not. Let me try to explain.
 
In the context of Trump’s upcoming visit to China in 2017, CNN posted an article on Chinese President Xi Jinping which declared that almost nothing is known about the man. Of course they said that not only because they are abysmally ignorant about the non-US-aligned East (which they despise), but also because if they had told the truth about Xi it would present an embarrassing contrast between an Easterner, a truly enlightened man who is challenging the zero-sum US economics with a deeply held belief in a win-win for everyone, and a West that seems not to comprehend this and in no way shares this sentiment. This simple idea is explained in Xi’s book “Up and Out of Poverty,” which no one in the West seems to have read and no one has meaningfully reviewed. (I read about this at a Chinese-language site). Which is perhaps why CNN thought nothing was known about Xi. The book, written in 1992 and later translated into English and French, tells of Xi’s experience as a social worker in Ningde in Shaanxi Province where he was sent as a youth by the government in a program along the lines of a domestic Peace Corps.


Xi, the son of a Chinese functionary from a relatively well-off city, was shocked at the grinding poverty he found in this town but immediately set about to change this situation. In short, thanks to his efforts, that town, which once had an annual average income of 198 USD, wound up with an average income of 8000 USD last year – virtually unheard of for rural China. Xi thinks he has reason to believe this miracle can be duplicated elsewhere.


Xi has stated in public that the poor concern him more than anything else. Therein lies the salient contrast between China and the West, where the elites, mostly billionaires and their lackeys, never say nice things about the poor, blaming them for not lifting themselves up by their own bootstrops using the levers of the wonderful capitalist system. While CNN admits it knows nothing about this, Xi’s dream is a nightmare to the West, where a Steve Bannon can get away with saying they want to “screw up” Xi’s dream to raise Africa out of poverty through his Belt and Road Initiative. Bannon was in essence saying to hell with the African poor, probably without even realizing it (the Western narrative is that the BRI is just a way of allowing China to rule the world like a despot, the way the US does now. There’s not a stick of evidence to support this, but when you have a multi-billion dollar propaganda machine at your service, who needs evidence?). Even worse, racist Bannon was admitting in this careless statement that he wants to destroy Xi’s chances of helping the African poor. Thoughtless statements like these stick around in history books. Let them eat cake?


But if the West ignores, wittingly or not, that Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative is aimed at raising Africa and other nations out of poverty, Africa is keenly aware of this and anxiously awaits its culmination.
​

In June of 2017, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi gave a keynote address to a meeting at the opening ceremony of the High-Level Dialogue on Poverty Reduction and Development held at the African Union Conference Centre in Addis Ababa, and said that China’s goal is to simultaneously lift the poor in both China and Africa out of poverty. Wang also delivered an inspiring talk about Xi’s book on his experiences working with the poor in Ningde. So unlike the shamefully ignorant US media and political class, the Africans are aware that much is known about President Xi and that Xi is a veteran in battling poverty, with success. Can you name an American president who has successfully lifted anyone out of poverty in the last half-century? Lyndon Johnson birthed welfare, but the ghettos grew in proportion to the money paid out because no attempt was made to allow the poor to lift themselves out of poverty. Xi, however, says that is what he did in Ningde and what he intends to do in the future. He also frequently uses the expression "win-win" in his speeches, as if to rebuke the West for its mean-spirited zero-sum nonsense.                           
 

The US is the leader of the World Bank and the IMF, organizations that have been involved in Africa for decades, issuing loans but not making a dent in African poverty. The reason for their failure is perhaps best summed up in the book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” by John Perkins, the former CEO for a CIA front company working for the World Bank whose trainer at the beginning of his career bluntly told him the goal of his company was to bankrupt Third World nations, making them dependent on these banks for more and more loans. Thus the West’s policy was self-defeating because — as Xi knows — banks make more money off of rich customers than poor ones. And this is the secret behind China’s policy, which could be summed up: I make you rich, you make me richer.


A brief explanation of how the IMF and World Bank keep Africans poor is found here.


By contrast, Xi’s China has lifted millions out of poverty from 2013 to 2016. The English-language Chinese site CGTN reports:


“A total of 55.64 million Chinese rural residents were lifted out of poverty from 2013 to 2016 and at least another 10 million will shake off poverty this year, which means the number of rural Chinese lifted out of poverty in five years will exceed 65 million – roughly the population of a major European country such as Britain, France or Italy.”
 
So when Trump went to Beijing, an arrogant and haughty man who boasted about his achievements met a humble man who, without a word of boasting, simply made China a much better place to live – and hopes to replicate that experience elsewhere.
 
And you know what’s funny? The Trump administration makes a big show of being “Christian,” while the CCP is avowedly atheist. Yet Xi’s behaviour and the love he shows toward his fellow humans is hundreds of times more Christ-like than Trump’s.
 
The first shall be last and the last shall be first.
 
 
5 Comments
John M Stassi
5/14/2020 02:15:48 pm

If Chinese President Xi Jinping is such a peach of a fellow and is so beloved by the Chinese people, why doesn't he repudiate his President-for-Life status and open the country to multi-party democracy and completely free elections with universal suffrage?

Why doesn't he cease his brutal and relentless persecution of all religions and all political dissidents?
SEE:
http://m.stnn.cc/pcarticle/703584

Reply
Jan Melih
5/14/2020 05:07:40 pm

Typical Anglo,swallowing western lies while stoking unrest in Muslim provinces and training insurgents to cause unrest and trouble.Are you totally brainwashed by "western propaganda machine"and see nothing else?People like you make me sick.

Reply
John M Stassi
5/15/2020 01:49:28 pm

This comment does not address either of my questions.

Rather, it consists of a vicious ad hominem attack that completely discredits whatever point the poster may have wanted to make, while doing nothing to convince any open-minded person that my questions are without merit.

I've encountered attacks like these from Zionists who are upset by my daring to intelligently question their ideological dogma.

Has the Chinese Communist Party trained and deployed online watchdogs to engage in the same sort of loud and ugly but otherwise pointless tactics?

Arindam
5/14/2020 10:28:26 pm

The rapid elimination of poverty in East Asia (not only in China, but also Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore) is due, in great part, to a financial system that is fundamentally different from the Western one. The key is channelling finances into specific sectors (industry, exports, etc..) and imposing a system of 'forced savings' to avoid inflationary and trade problems. This enables an economy to maintain high growth rates for a prolonged period of time - ultimately generating high employment and rising wages that altogether rid the country of poverty.

Three key texts on this subject are Chalmers Johnson's 'MITI and the Japanese Miracle', Robert Wade's 'Governing the Market', and Eamonn Fingleton's 'In the Jaws of the Dragon'.

It will be interesting to see which other countries in the developing world adopt the East Asian system.

Reply
John McClain
5/17/2020 12:47:19 pm

As an American, this is the first time I've heard of President Xi Jinping's book, (shocking, isn't it) and I'd be very interested in finding it to read.
As to all the fools who parrot "democracy" as good government, always demanding others, 'try this on for size', and if they don't, they must be prejudiced, we aren't a democracy, we are an "Oligarchy" or Fascist government, to be precise, and we have "crony capitalism", not capitalism, which has never failed, except when conquered by war or banks.
Capitalism is just the same good old fashioned way of those with specific skills, making their best product, to trade with those whose product they desire, and the whole of it profiting all sides, as the President's "win-win" statement means.
If China has a totalitarian government, it is precisely because She had been invaded and occupied for a century, used as "Europe's whore house", enforced in part by U.S. Marines, and a dozen other military forces of Europe.
Just as the U.S. government has never even paused, attacking Russia, not even a moment, after "perestroika", I have to see every statement made by U.S. personnel as self serving, generally ignorant, and usually hate-filled rhetoric.
I've been to China a couple times, as a U.S. Marine, and despite that fact, was treated quite well, welcomed, and was in my own turn, as gracious as I know how. I took the time to walk through "Hankow" when I was first there, Communist China, across the inland waters from Hong Kong, and while quite shy, once no offence was given, very open, eager to just simply talk, show their wares, but they wanted to know "who I was inside", as much as anything else. I spent a career, around the world, with few other types of experiences, other than war I ended up in, one way or another.
I am most frequently, disgusted with my fellow American's willingness to listen to politicians they laugh at on our own issues, but take seriously, when describing foreign affairs.
I grew up a "navy brat", and was raised to accept people as they are, and present themselves to each other, and my father and mom were taught the same, by their parents, as a matter of course.
I am very enthusiastic about the belt-road initiative, I've studied China back to its early days, have long agreed with much of its older philosophy, and according the God, it's not "the yes, yes, but don't do, that wins the prize, but even the no, not ever, but goes and does it, because it needs be done, who will see the Father. That sounds in keeping with Mr. Jinping's life, as I know it, and intentions, as he states. It's been many, many decades, since I had any respect for a U.S. president, and I've since discovered, he was as underhanded as many.
God Bless this work,
Semper Fidelis,
John McClain
GySgt, USMC, ret,
Vanceboro, NC, USA

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
    • Русский язык
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Español
  • Geopolitics
    • International Relations
    • Military Affairs
    • News & Analysis
    • Culture
    • Economics and Finance
  • Language
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Contact