Vince Dhimos answered a question at Quora.
If you had to listen to either Chelsea Clinton or Ivanka Trump discuss foreign policy, who would you rather hear speak? Why or why not?
Vince Dhimos Geopolitical Analyst at New Silk Strategies (2016–present)
What most Westerners fail to understand is that US foreign policy has nothing to do with the voters and nothing to do with establishing and maintaining good relations with foreign states. In fact, it is not a policy at all, just a mean-spirited and criminal attempt to disenfranchise the inhabitants of the Muslim world, breaking up their states into smaller weaker ones that are easier for the US and Israel to control. Thus the grassroots can’t control “foreign policy” with their vote because they do not choose the candidates. The elites at the top of the pyramid choose them and they absolutely will never give you a candidate who differs significantly from the presidents who went before them and mired us down in war after war after war in the Middle East, North Africa and Afghanistan. This is why it is so foolish to believe that Trump was different or that he wanted to “drain the swamp” of the Deep State. After all, the fact that Trump caters to Netanyahu’s every whim is absolute proof that he is just another alligator in the swamp. I had written about the agents that control the US and if you are a middle class American, they do not include you.
Here is the list again, and almost at the very top we have Israel and its lobbies, notably AIPAC, which virtually writes all of US foreign policy, at least as concerns the Muslim world (North Africa and Middle East, MENA). Now if Trump had come out and said he was going to reform US policy on Israel and work for a just resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict (and that would mean not giving Israel more Arab land! Jared Kushner would not have been given a cabinet position), then we could say that Trump was departing from Deep State policies and trying to “drain the swamp.” Unfortunately, though, he would never have gotten elected under those circumstances, partly because the Deep State would have blocked him and partly because US Evangelicals – 80% of whom advocate supporting Israel against the Palestinians – would not have supported him. (Here is a deconstruction of “Christian” Zionism: http://www.newsilkstrategies.com/international-relations/christian-zionism-has-taken-the-world-to-the-brink-of-war-but-has-no-basis-in-scripture)
In the twisted, sick US system, foreign policy does not require any expertise at all, which is why it is completely irrelevant what Chelsea or Ivanka think or say about it. I once read an article that told the true story of a man well versed in Middle Eastern studies who applied for a job at the State Department. When the official in charge was reviewing his application, he said “you are knowledgeable about such and such a region and you speak several Middle Eastern languages?” “That’s correct,” the applicant answered. “Sorry, we can’t use you.” came the frigid reply.
The State Department is only interested in people with the correct ideology, not with knowledge of the different regions of their “expertise.” After all, if a candidate had in-depth intimate knowledge of a region, he or she might sympathise with the people who lived there and would be less apt to want to bomb and sanction them. That would never do for the Frankensteins at the State Department who seek to destroy them!
Chelsea’s mom knew next to nothing about the tribes, languages, cultures, attitudes and politics of the Muslim world, only that she and her boss, Obama, supported the Muslim Brotherhood and wanted it to take over North Africa, while they wanted the Gulf States and the Wahhabists to take over the Middle East. That’s total terrorist control of the region aimed at creating chaos, and it was a goal shared by both Hillary and her boss.
If that is news to you, have a listen to the speech in the below-linked video, starting at minute 1:23:
If you were paying attention when Obama was pretending to wage a “war on terror” but in fact allowing ISIS militias to enter Syria by the hundreds in those famous white Toyota trucks with machine guns mounted on their beds, and when he bombed Libya just long enough to get Ghaddafi brutally murdered and replaced by Muslim Brotherhood militias, then you know that, regardless of whether the referenced policy document actually existed, Obama did indeed pursue the strategy described in that speech and that whatever foreign policy “expertise” Secretary of State Hillary might have had, there was never any question of genuine expertise at the State Department, the only requisite for its officials being a loyalty to this sick strategy – which it would be reasonable to expect Biden to continue if he is elected in November. Thus, whatever Chelsea may have learned in her course work at college, there is no reason to believe that, should she be elected to a position in the State Department, she would depart from the policies pursued by her mother during the war on Ghaddafi and the Libyan people.
This diabolical strategy to break up states and disenfranchise people is why Hillary’s boss had Ghaddafi murdered, plunging Libya into a chaos of black slavery and terrorism that has not changed since then. It didn’t take expertise to accomplish this, it took a dark nihilistic sadistic mind. Neither Chelsea nor Ivanka have any new ideas that will change that.
And a Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Libya is what Obama attempted to establish. He failed mainly because Russia entered the Middle East in 2015 and gave the US a lesson in respect. We can hope that Washington will continue to fail in implementing their perverted policies in the Muslim world no matter who becomes president in November.
Unless Chelsea has broken radically from her mother, then this is the policy she would support, a policy to destabilize the North Africa Middle East (NEMA) region in order to maintain control on behalf of Israel and its Yinon Plan (see video linked above). As far as we can tell at this point, that strategy has not changed for the Democrats. It is why they support the terrorist-backed GNA.
As for Ivanka, she and her husband are firm supporters of her husband Jared Kushner’s so-called Deal of the Century, a policy of allowing Israel to annex more land illegally in Palestine and Jerusalem as part of the long-term Israeli strategy of incrementally disenfranchising the few Arabs left in their original territory. Thus I would not waste one second of my time listening to either of these two women discuss foreign policy because their ideas can be expected to be pure ideology, no real world solutions at all. The ideas they represent are the reason for all the wars in the last 3 decades or so.
Here is why Trump and his “Christian” Zionist followers are dreadfully, tragically wrong:
THE PARABLE OF THE GOOD SAMARITAN. WHAT YOUR PASTOR DIDN’T TELL YOU