NEW SILK STRATEGIES
  • Home
    • Русский язык
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Español
  • Geopolitics
    • International Relations
    • Military Affairs
    • News & Analysis
    • Culture
    • Economics and Finance
  • Language
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Contact

Military affairs.

ONE VOLLEY FROM THE BOREY WILL WIPE THE US FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH

2/17/2019

2 Comments

 
Below is our translation of an article from Riafan that was intended to sober up Washington, with commentary by Vince Dhimos.
 
BEGIN TRANSLATION
 
One volley of “Boreay” will erase any country from the face of the earth: how will the Russian Federation defend itself from the United States when the INF collapses
 
The NATO military attaché’s ignoring of the briefing by the Russian Ministry of Defence, at which the 9M729 missile [see report] was exhibited, more than proves that Washington has no desire to discuss the problems of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). This was stated by the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov.
 
“Undoubtedly, this is more than indicative, since it shows there is still no mood to discuss the issues of the INF. Some other modalities, such as the exchange of ultimatums, unfounded accusations and an unwillingness to hear a partner, do not quite suit us,” Peskov responded to the absence of representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance at an event in the Russian military department.
 
Recall that at a briefing for foreign military attaches on January 23, the Russian Defence Ministry presented the 9M729 missile of the Iskander-M series, which the US considers to be a violation of the INF Treaty, and spoke about its characteristics.
 
The military attaches and representatives of the military-diplomatic corps of the CSTO, BRICS, the European Union and NATO, as well as some other European and Asian countries were invited to the briefing. The Defence Ministry told reporters that military attaches from the United States, Britain, France and Germany, as well as representatives of the European Union and the NATO mission in Russia did not attend the briefing.
 
As political analyst Andrei Kolyadin explained to the Federal News Agency’s correspondent, Washington over the past years has simply been looking for a reason to withdraw from the INF Treaty, as this limited the further development of the US military machine. The expert drew attention to the fact that the States and its NATO allies have long displayed aggressive intentions and revitalization of the armed forces.
 
“The decision to withdraw from the agreement was made quite a long time ago, and at least for this, all preparatory actions (and the launching of combat satellites into space, and the approach of NATO to the borders of Russia) have long been underway. This shows that the Americans are trying to strengthen their military position in relation to Russia,” said Kolyadin.
 
Kolyadin warned Washington against breaking agreements on the containment of armaments, as this would create a serious military threat to the whole world. At the same time, the political scientist stressed that Russia will have enough resources to confront the United States.
 
“This, unfortunately, is the reality of the present time. A modern submarine of the Borey class can emerge from under the ice cap and lie motionless at the bottom for 600 days and cannot be tracked , can wipe out any country in the world with a single volley.
 
And there are such subs not only in Russia, but also in the United States and a number of European powers. Any large-scale military campaign involving modern weapons is completely meaningless. It will still lead to the self-destruction of mankind,” said the political scientist.
 
According to Kolyadin, the US attempts to get out of all such agreements causes the chances of war to multiply.
 
“When there are no restrictions, when one country believes that it can defeat another in a lightning war, this leads to the fact that in a very short battle all of earth suffers. Any such approach causes a threat to the existence of our civilization.
 
The ideas of Americans about withdrawing from the INF Treaty and the hope that they will secure their country in this way will lead to the opposite result. Russia will be able to defend itself against any weapon, but this will lead to very serious consequences for the United States,” he concluded.
 
In recent years, Moscow and Washington have regularly accused each other of violating the INF. Russia has repeatedly stated that it strictly complies with its obligations under the contract. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov noted that Moscow has very serious questions to the United States about the implementation of the contract.
 
The author: Konstantin Smirnov
 
END TRANSLATION
 
RUSSIA PROVES IT DID NOT VIOLATE THE INF TREATY – US IGNORES PROOF
 
http://www.newsilkstrategies.com/military-affairs/russia-proves-it-did-not-violate-the-inf-treaty-us-ignores-proof
​
2 Comments
John McClain
2/20/2019 05:06:47 am

I've been following America's war and military policy since 63, arriving back in the states at six. I'd spent two years in Barcelona, Spain, two in Naples, Italy, my dad a Naval officer, re-supplying our "ballistic missile destroyer fleet, established around the Med.
What I discovered at my arrival, having left the U.S. at one, was nothing was as described in my father's childhood books, every principle was skewed, twisted, distorted, and few would fail to argue as to "good reason why", and acknowledge "principle twisted was principle lost".
Born in 1957, I've spent my whole life with the full understanding of MAD, it's been the principle keeping a third world war away all my life. At sixty one, it is far beyond ridiculous, and fully into the realm of insanity, blown large.
When it began, the primaries believed the possibility of unreturnable first strike, and very quickly ensured the other couldn't, slamming that door.
The enormous and successful efforts to limit arms, changed the rhetoric of professional war mongers, the publishing of actual threats and status, such that both sides developed "tactical nukes", and "clandestine nukes", as if a limited nuclear engagement was realistically possible.
Having "slid into that mentality" while still capable of eliminating life an hundred times over, we now live with the notion we might see a nuclear exchange, and go on.
Few want to acknowledge, that is no more possible today, than in sixty two, or seventy, it has never and will never be true.
Today half a dozen ICBM's from each side, or three or four or five sides, ends life as we know it, for the foreseeable future. No rational person can expect a nuclear weapon used and not fully retaliated against, ensuring it won't be followed. Any person who can't see, and immediately understand this, doesn't qualify as "rational, capable of understanding".
There is only one solution to ending the nuclear option, getting rid of the weapons. How can we not see, once two weapons exist, they cease having any serious meaning in the idea of security?
Logic suggests one either chooses the full panoply of "defense", or to negotiate the complete absence of all, with a compelling plan to all descend on any violator. Of course the U.S. would have to agree to be an "ordinary Nation", no longer "the exceptional Nation", we never really were.
Semper Fidelis,
John McClain
Vanceboro, NC, USA

Reply
Dr. Roger Kotila link
2/28/2019 09:42:43 am

The answer has been available since 1945 or earlier: We must establish a world federal union government. The UN must be transformed into a "new UN" with a new World Charter/Constitution.

Currently we are trapped in a global geopolitical war system. We must end wars and eliminate all weapons of mass destruction -- everywhere.

Ending the war system is possible. World federalists know what is needed.

This will require a new geopolitical structure. The nations must Federate. World federal government, like Einstein came to understand, is the answer to eliminating the nuclear nightmare, and ending war itself.

The Earth Constitution is a model world federal union constitution and is ready to go to replace the fatally flawed UN Charter. The UN General Assembly must launch a review of the obsolete UN Charter using the Earth Constitution as its guide and model.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
    • Русский язык
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Español
  • Geopolitics
    • International Relations
    • Military Affairs
    • News & Analysis
    • Culture
    • Economics and Finance
  • Language
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Contact