Who is really to blame for the NY pickup truck terror?
America has been hit by a terrorist attack perpetrated by an Uzbek who drove a pickup into a bicycle trail in New York, killing at least 7 people. The responses were immediate and vociferous, but not in any way uniform.
Citing the fact that the terrorist had come to the US under a diversity lottery visa, Trump called for an immediate end to this kind of visa. Which would made sense if not for the fact that Trump’s no-visa list for “Muslims” excludes Saudis, the founders and biggest sponsors of Al-Qaeda and ISIS, while including the Iranians, who have, however, no significant participation in these terror group and have never demonstrably perpetrated a terror attack of this kind in the West.
Daniel Greenfield, an Israeli with laudable loyalty to his home country, immediately responded with a piece titled We Didn't Beat ISIS, It's Here, stating that ISIS is not a group. “It’s an Idea. The idea is Islam.”
It is true that some people identifying with ISIS are here, but not in the way Greenfield asserts. ISIS is a product of Washington DC. It can trace its origin to the offices of lawmakers like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, for example, and most other lawmakers' offices. None of these agents are Muslims but they foment Muslim extremism and have been doing so for many years. As for Israel, a former Israeli defense minister has admitted that his country collaborated with ISIS.
ISIS is a group of radicals (not your run of the mill Muslims as propagandists like Greenfield want us to believe) most of whom were sponsored and trained by the US-Saudi-Israeli coalition. Without the money and clandestine cooperation of this US-led undeclared coalition, there would be no ISIS.
A few Muslims were radicalized by Wahhabists (also often called Salafists or takfiris) under the auspices of the Saudis but with covert assistance and funding from the US. Syria had almost no radical Islam for many years and was in fact an oasis of peace in the Middle East until the US and partners (including European governments) started sending the jihadists weapons around the time of the Arab Spring to oust the Syrian administration (not regime) of the duly elected Bashar el Assad. What Israeli and US Neocon propagandists will never mention is that the Iranian Shiites -- the ones Israel wants us to fear the most -- are not part of the Sunni-Wahhabist jihadist terror organizations ISIS and Al-Qaeda and their rebrandings. The reason they want you to think Islam per se and not Wahhabism, is to blame for the terror is that by blaming Islam as a whole, and not specific perpetrator groups, the US-Saudi-Israel coalition can exploit your simplistic unnuanced mindset to wage war on the Islamic nations that they arbitrarily name as enemies. And these selected “enemies” are primarily the Shiites, ie, precisely the Muslims not involved in terror. In fact, Shiite Iran provided a significant percentage of the boots on the ground in the real fight against the terror that the US only grudgingly fought and/or pretended to fight. One of the main reasons the US keeps up this blame-Iran farce is that just after the Iranian Islamic Revolution was proclaimed, the Iranian leadership, notably under Ahmadinejad, brandished exuberant rhetoric against the US, calling it, eg, the Great Satan, and also threatening Israel. However, once negotiations toward the Iran nuclear deal got underway, almost certainly under the mitigating influence of Vladimir Putin, the rhetoric was toned down and eventually, Ahmadinejad was replaced by the more mild-mannered Rouhani, who sounds more mature and civilized and is also making strides in human rights – in contrast to the Saudis, who, however, strangely, almost never meet with Western criticism, making the anti-Iran chorus sound absurd and incongruous..
Linked below is some newly leaked info from US-backed officials showing just how involved the West has been in developing, sponsoring and training terror organizations. Iran is not named here because Iranians were busy fighting ISIS and, being Shiites, Iranians are generally not admitted in these Sunni groups, nor do they desire to join:
Arms to terrorists from US, Gulf states via diplomatic flights
SA, Turkey and US colluded and coordinated to fund Al-Qaeda and destroy Syria
Saudis ordered attack on Damascus international airport with US knowledge: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-24/bombshell-nsa-memo-saudi-arabia-ordered-attack-damascus-international-airport-us-kno
The fact that an Uzbek would launch a terror attack in the US should not surprise anyone, but not because Uzbekistan is mostly Muslim. George Soros had set up a foundation there and was behind one of his many regime change operations that got people killed, similarly to the Maidan coup, which billionaire George Soros – along with USAID and National Endowment for Democracy -- also financed. The Uzbek government, not willing to let foreigners dictate policies, subsequently ousted the Soros foundation.
The CIA link to Uzbek terror is clearly outlined in the below linked reports:
“ the Sharp template and financing from Soros and the CIA-linked National Endowment for Democracy (NED) symbols were used in the themed Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia (Jasmine) and Egypt (Lotus) and attempted revolutions in Georgia (Rose), Lebanon (Cedar), Uzbekistan (Cotton), and Moldova (Grape).”
“The use of Uzbek mercenaries by the CIA is almost as old as the American spy agency itself. In fact, CIA-Uzbek jihadist cooperation dates back some 63 years. According to its own formerly TOP SECRET Central Intelligence Bulletin, dated December 4, 1952, during the waning days of the Harry Truman administration, the CIA embarked on a program to foment nationalism tinged with jihadism among the Uzbek tribes of northern Afghanistan in order that it might spill across the border into the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic, a constituent republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.”
You may also recall the CIA link to the Boston Marathon bomb terror, as described here:
The false association of terror with Islam per se, and especially the false association with Shiite countries Like Iran and Shiite leaders like Assad, in the minds of the stupefied public is precisely the mind control weapon that the Western Establishment needs to continue the war against innocents abroad.
When a knowledgeable person learns of a terrorist attack on the West, the natural immediate association in terms of the act itself will not be “Islam” but rather the Muslim sect “Wahhabism” (or Salafism or takfirism) and the association in terms of terror support will be “CIA,” “Soros,” “USAID” and “NED,” or in other words, Western or US-backing.
When these mental associations become as automatic in enough Westerners as they are already in most Easterners, notably Russians and Chinese, the elitist war on terror will be seen for what it is and the real war on terror can begin.
Otherwise, get used to more terror on Western soil ad infinitum.